How this ranking scores a vendor: a worked example

Every score on this site decomposes into eight dimensions, and each dimension into records with evidence ids. This post walks one vendor's total from its records.

The example vendor is the median of the ranking, chosen by position so the example does not feature the leader: HCLTech, rank 7 of 13, total 21.

DimensionCalculation from the recordsScoreEvidence ids
d1 Logistics case study depth3 recorded case studies with grades A 0, B 2, C 1 give 5 points; min(25, round(25 x 5 / 12)) = 10.10/25ev-0443 ev-0452 ev-0466
d2 Case study evidence qualityShare of grade A case studies 0/3; round(15 x share), capped at 10 with one case study = 0.0/15
d3 Logistics system coverage2 distinct systems (EDI and carrier integrations, WMS); round(12 x 2 / 6) = 4.4/12ev-0455 ev-0469
d4 Client review evidence in logistics0 reviews within 36 months and 0 older (half weight); min(15, round(15 x weighted / 5)) = 0.0/15
d5 Review specificity0 of 0 counted reviews are specific; score 0.0/8
d6 Logistics testing capability evidence1 testing types evidenced (test automation); round(10 x 1 / 4) = 3.3/10ev-0446 ev-0456 ev-0470
d7 Delivery footprint and continuityFounded 10+ years ago (two sources): no; size 51+ (two sources): no; 2+ regions (two sources): yes; an engagement of 12+ months: no; 2 points each = 2.2/8ev-0433 ev-0434 ev-0435 ev-0436 ev-0438 ev-0439
d8 TransparencyEngagement models on the vendor site: yes; certification with a register source: no; pricing published: no; score 2.2/7ev-0441

Records behind this score: Accelerating DevOps maturity through automated test coverage (HCLTech, grade C); Transforming automotive logistics through GenAI adoption and value-stream re-engineering (HCLTech, grade B); Getting every food order right through smarter warehouse system testing (HCLTech, grade B).

Sum: 10 + 0 + 4 + 0 + 0 + 3 + 2 + 2 = 21. Scoring date 2026-11-11.

The same calculation runs for every vendor in scripts/compute-scores.ts; a second run reproduces the output byte for byte. Rules and weights: methodology. Full ranking: ranking.

Scenario rankings: all scenario rankings. Method: methodology. Data: case study index, ranking, downloads.

Sources

    Scores are computed from vendors' published case studies and third-party reviews by the methodology on this site, frozen on the date shown. Case study outcomes are quoted as published by the vendor and are not verified results. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. This site does not accept payment from vendors.

    Suggest a case study or correction