Logistics software testing companies, ranked from evidence
13 of 22 assessed vendors passed the scope gate and are ranked. The order below is computed by scripts/compute-scores.ts from the methodology frozen on 2026-11-10; scoring date 2026-11-11.
| Vendor | Evidence | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | N-iX | 35 | 13/25 | 5/15 | 4/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 3/10 | 8/8 | 2/7 | 27 |
| 2 | a1qa | 35 | 13/25 | 0/15 | 4/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 8/10 | 8/8 | 2/7 | 31 |
| 3 | Qualitest | 30 | 8/25 | 0/15 | 4/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 8/10 | 8/8 | 2/7 | 29 |
| 4 | ScienceSoft | 27 | 4/25 | 0/15 | 2/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 10/10 | 6/8 | 5/7 | 24 |
| 5 | DeviQA | 26 | 6/25 | 0/15 | 2/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 10/10 | 6/8 | 2/7 | 30 |
| 6 | Crestech | 24 | 13/25 | 0/15 | 2/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 5/10 | 2/8 | 2/7 | 12 |
| 7 | HCLTech | 21 | 10/25 | 0/15 | 4/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 3/10 | 2/8 | 2/7 | 15 |
| 8 | ImpactQA | 20 | 6/25 | 10/15 | 0/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 0/10 | 2/8 | 2/7 | 12 |
| 9 | Codoid | 20 | 6/25 | 0/15 | 2/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 8/10 | 2/8 | 2/7 | 14 |
| 10 | TestingXperts | 18 | 4/25 | 0/15 | 0/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 10/10 | 2/8 | 2/7 | 9 |
| 11 | BugRaptors | 18 | 2/25 | 0/15 | 0/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 8/10 | 6/8 | 2/7 | 18 |
| 12 | auticon | 15 | 4/25 | 0/15 | 2/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 3/10 | 4/8 | 2/7 | 10 |
Click a column header to sort. Dimension names: methodology. Ties: higher d1, then d2, then name.
Also assessed
| Vendor | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Mindfire Solutions | 13 | 4/25 | 0/15 | 2/12 | 0/15 | 0/8 | 3/10 | 2/8 | 2/7 |
No published evidence for, by vendor
N-iX: 8 absences
- d3 No published case study for fleet and telematics
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
- d6 No published evidence of performance and peak load testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of mobile and handheld testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of integration, EDI and API testing in a case study or review
- d8 No published pricing
a1qa: 6 absences
- d3 No published case study for TMS
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
- d6 No published evidence of integration, EDI and API testing in a case study or review
- d8 No published pricing
Qualitest: 6 absences
- d3 No published case study for TMS
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
- d6 No published evidence of mobile and handheld testing in a case study or review
- d8 No published pricing
ScienceSoft: 5 absences
- d3 No published case study for TMS
- d3 No published case study for fleet and telematics
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
DeviQA: 6 absences
- d3 No published case study for TMS
- d3 No published case study for fleet and telematics
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
- d8 No published pricing
Crestech: 8 absences
- d3 No published case study for WMS
- d3 No published case study for TMS
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
- d6 No published evidence of performance and peak load testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of mobile and handheld testing in a case study or review
- d8 No published pricing
HCLTech: 8 absences
- d3 No published case study for TMS
- d3 No published case study for fleet and telematics
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d6 No published evidence of performance and peak load testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of mobile and handheld testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of integration, EDI and API testing in a case study or review
- d8 No published pricing
ImpactQA: 11 absences
- d3 No published case study for WMS
- d3 No published case study for TMS
- d3 No published case study for fleet and telematics
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
- d6 No published evidence of test automation testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of performance and peak load testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of mobile and handheld testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of integration, EDI and API testing in a case study or review
- d8 No published pricing
Codoid: 7 absences
- d3 No published case study for WMS
- d3 No published case study for TMS
- d3 No published case study for fleet and telematics
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
- d6 No published evidence of performance and peak load testing in a case study or review
- d8 No published pricing
TestingXperts: 7 absences
- d3 No published case study for WMS
- d3 No published case study for TMS
- d3 No published case study for fleet and telematics
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
- d8 No published pricing
BugRaptors: 8 absences
- d3 No published case study for WMS
- d3 No published case study for TMS
- d3 No published case study for fleet and telematics
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
- d6 No published evidence of test automation testing in a case study or review
- d8 No published pricing
auticon: 9 absences
- d3 No published case study for WMS
- d3 No published case study for fleet and telematics
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
- d6 No published evidence of performance and peak load testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of mobile and handheld testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of integration, EDI and API testing in a case study or review
- d8 No published pricing
Mindfire Solutions: 9 absences
- d3 No published case study for WMS
- d3 No published case study for fleet and telematics
- d3 No published case study for last-mile delivery
- d3 No published case study for freight and forwarding
- d3 No published case study for EDI and carrier integrations
- d6 No published evidence of performance and peak load testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of mobile and handheld testing in a case study or review
- d6 No published evidence of integration, EDI and API testing in a case study or review
- d8 No published pricing
Questions
Which QA company fits a logistics software program?
This site does not choose for a program. It ranks vendors on published logistics evidence; the order above is computed, and the scenario rankings re-score vendors per system and testing type (10 scenario pages). Read the case studies behind each score before deciding.
Which supply chain and logistics systems do QA vendors test?
Recorded case studies per system across the 29 in the corpus: WMS 7, TMS 3, fleet and telematics 4, last-mile delivery 0, freight and forwarding 1, EDI and carrier integrations 1. A case study can name several systems; see the case study index.
What types of testing does logistics domain software need?
Testing types evidenced in the recorded case studies: test automation 21, performance and peak load 8, mobile and handheld 8, integration, EDI and API 8. Procedures per type are in the blog.
Scores are computed from vendors' published case studies and third-party reviews by the methodology on this site, frozen on the date shown. Case study outcomes are quoted as published by the vendor and are not verified results. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. This site does not accept payment from vendors.